<p>-
- Few thought airstrikes could 'obliterate' Iran's nuclear program. Then Trump said they did.</p>
<p>Davis Winkie, USA TODAYJune 28, 2025 at 4:06 AM</p>
<p>WASHINGTON — A highly politicized debate is unfolding over the impact of June 21 U.S. airstrikes against Iran's nuclear facilities, raising questions over the attack's goal and projected impact.</p>
<p>President Donald Trump quickly claimed total victory in the strikes' wake, claiming that Iran's "key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated." Subsequent scrutiny of that claim amid early assessments from intelligence agencies has led Trump and his allies to double down on and even expand on his declarations of success. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth claimed to CNN that the strikes "obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons."</p>
<p>Iran itself has acknowledged the impact of the U.S. and Israeli attacks.</p>
<p>But in the years since Washington's withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal with Tehran, experts and analysts have emphasized that airstrikes alone would merely delay Iran's nuclear ambitions rather than permanently derail them. Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Illinois, reiterated that long-held understanding in a June 26 interview.</p>
<p>"The targets are hard targets, deep targets, mobile targets. So it was never meant to eliminate the program," Quigley told USA TODAY. "It was never meant to do anything but slow the program."</p>
<p>The congressman, who is on the House's intelligence committee and has regularly received briefings on Iran, added, "We've always been told . . . the only way to end this (nuclear) program is with a lot of troops on the ground for a long time. A war."</p>
<p>The former head of the National Nuclear Security Agency's nonproliferation programs, Corey Hinderstein, struck a similar tone.</p>
<p>"The conventional wisdom that you can't destroy the Iranian (nuclear) program through air attack alone has actually held," said Hinderstein, now a vice president at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "While some are saying that the airstrikes were tactically and strategically successful, I think that the jury is still out on that, and we don't actually have the information that we need to believe that this program is gone."</p>
<p>Third nuclear site, hidden centrifuges, missing uranium</p>
<p>Iran may have another nuclear site that, if equipped with enrichment centrifuges and conversion equipment, could continue the process of preparing uranium for use in a nuclear bomb, if the regime wishes to pursue one.</p>
<p>Shortly before Israel began its air campaign against Iran, the regime told the International Atomic Energy Agency that it had a third nuclear enrichment site but did not reveal details.</p>
<p>Analysts believe an undisclosed underground facility at Pickaxe Mountain near the Natanz nuclear plant may be even deeper under the surface than the Fordow enrichment plant that was severely damaged in the U.S. strikes. The Pickaxe Mountain facility was first publicly revealed in 2023 by experts who spoke with the .</p>
<p>And it's unclear how much of Tehran's approximately 880 pounds of highly enriched uranium was destroyed or buried during the strikes — satellite images show cargo trucks parked outside the Fordow enrichment plant in the days before the U.S. attack.</p>
<p>U.S. lawmakers briefed June 26 and June 27 on intelligence assessments of the strikes acknowledged the missing uranium and called for a full accounting of the material, according to CNN. Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, told the news agency that the question of the uranium's whereabouts underscores the importance of Iran negotiating "directly with us, so the (IAEA) can account for every ounce of enriched uranium that's there."</p>
<p>More: Where is Iran's enriched uranium? Questions loom after Trump claims victory.</p>
<p>But whether Iran wants to negotiate is another question.</p>
<p>Despite the country's obligations as a member of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, Iran's Guardian Council approved a law June 25 halting the country's cooperation with the IAEA and its inspections of Tehran's nuclear sites "until the safety and security of our nuclear activities can be guaranteed," the country's foreign minister said on social media.</p>
<p>Contributing: Tom Vanden Brook and Cybele Mayes-Osterman, USA TODAY</p>
<p>Davis Winkie's role covering nuclear threats and national security at USA TODAY is supported by a partnership with Outrider Foundation and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.</p>
<p>This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Few thought airstrikes could end Iran's nuke program. Did they?</p>
Source: AOL Politics
Source: AsherMag
Full Article on Source: Astro Blog
#LALifestyle #USCelebrities